|
Welcome Guest
|
|
You are using Guest Account
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Serial No. 1 Names of Judicial Interpretations: Official Reply of the Supreme People's Court on the Issue that the Formalities for Going Abroad Are Not to Be Handled by Courts and the Issue of Delivering the Relevant Legal Documents Date of Promulgation & Document No. : May 24, 1978; No. 12 [78] of the Supreme People's Court Reasons of Abrogation: It has been substituted for by the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China adopted by the National People's Congress on April 9, 1991. Serial No. 2 Names of Judicial Interpretations: Official Reply of the Supreme People's Court on the Issue of Whether Postal Institutions Shall Bear the Liability of Indemnity for Delayed or Mistakenly-sent Telegraphs Date of Promulgation & Document No. : Dec. 30, 1986; Reply No. 38 [1986] of the Supreme People's Court Reasons of Abrogation: It has been substituted for by the Official Reply of the Supreme People's Court on the Issue of Whether the People's Courts Shall Accept and Hear the Lawsuits Brought Due to Disputes over Delayed Telegraphs by Postal Institutions (Interpretation No. 11 [1999]) of the Supreme People's Court on June 9, 1999 Serial No. 3 Names of Judicial Interpretations: Official Reply of the Supreme People's Court on the Issue of Whether the People's Courts Shall Accept and Hear Cases over Disputes Arising out of Loan Contracts on Circulating Financial Funds for Supporting Agriculture Date of Promulgation & Document No. : Aug. 3, 1987; Official Reply No. 29 [1987] of the Supreme People's Court Reasons of Abrogation: It has been substituted for by the Official Reply of the Supreme People's Court on Whether the People's Courts Shall accept Disputes Arising out of Contracts of Loans Granted by Non-Financial Administrative Institutions Such as Fiscal Offices or Poverty Reduction Offices (Official Reply No. 7 [1993]) of the Supreme People's Court on August 28, 1993. Serial No. 4 Names of Judicial Interpretations: Official Reply of the Supreme People's Court on the issue of Who Shall Undertake the Debts after the Bankruptcy of An Enterprise Established by An Administrative Institution or Another Enterprise Date of Promulgation & Document No. : Aug. 29, 1987; Official Reply No. 33 [1987] of the Supreme People's Court Reasons of Abrogation: It has been substituted for by the Official Reply of the Supreme People's Court on the Issue of Bearing the Civil Liability for a Cancelled or Closed Enterprise Which Was Established by Another Enterprise (Official Reply No. 4 [1994]) of the Supreme People's Court on March 30, 1994. Serial No. 5 Names of Judicial Interpretations: Notice of the Supreme People's Court on Printing and Distributing the Specific Provisions on Compulsorily Selling off Vessels Distained to Pay off Debts Date of Promulgation & Document No. : Aug. 29, 1987;No. 22 [1987] of the Supreme People's Court Reasons of Abrogation: It has been substituted for by the Law of the People's Republic of China on Special Maritime Litigation Procedures adopted by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on December 25, 1999. Serial No. 6 Names of Judicial Interpretations: Official Reply of the Supreme People's Court on the Issue of How to Apply Law to Indemnity Disputes over Contract of Carriage due to Losses of Insured Goods Date of Promulgation & Document No. : May 30, 1989; No. 3 [1989] of the Supreme People's Court Reasons of Abrogation: The Economic Contract Law of the People's Republic of China as its original basis has been invalidated. Serial No. 7 Names of Judicial Interpretations: Letter of the Supreme People's Court on the Issue of Whether the People's Courts Shall Accept Disputes over Contracts on the Sale of Inferior and Fake Commodities Which Have Been Investigated by the Administrative Departments of Industry and Commerce Date of Promulgation & Document No. : May 30, 1989; Letter No. 15 (89) of the Supreme People's Court Reasons of Abrogation: It has been substituted for by the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China adopted by the National People's Congress on April 9, 1991. Serial No. 8 Names of Judicial Interpretations: Reply of the Civil Division of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Procedures for Reconsidering Civil Sanctions Date of Promulgation & Document No. : Apr. 13, 1990; No. 47 (89) concerning Other Civil Affairs Reasons of Abrogation: It has been substituted for by the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China adopted by the National People's Congress on April 9, 1991 and the Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on the Relevant Issues concerning the Application of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China' promulgated by the Supreme People's Court on July 14, 1992 (No. 22 [1992] of the Supreme People's Court). Serial No. 9 Names of Judicial Interpretations: Notice of the Supreme People's Court on the Relevant Issues concerning the Application of Document No. 68 [1990] of the State Council in Economic Trials Date of Promulgation & Document No. : Mar. 16, 1991; No. 10 [1991] of the Supreme People's Court Reasons of Abrogation: It has actually been invalidated due to the change of the situation. Serial No. 10 Names of Judicial Interpretations: Notice of the Supreme People's Court on the Relevant Issues concerning the Application of the Decision on Amending the Economic Contract Law of the People's Republic of China Date of Promulgation & Document No. : Nov. 27, 1993; No. 39 [1993] of the Supreme People's Court Reasons of Abrogation: The Economic Contract Law of the People's Republic of China as its original basis has been invalidated. Serial No. 11 Names of Judicial Interpretations: Reply of the Supreme People's Court on the Issue of Which Standard to Be Based on to Calculate Penalty of Overdue Payment Date of Promulgation & Document No. : Mar. 12, 1994; Letter No. 10 [1994] of the Supreme People's Court Reasons of Abrogation: It has been substituted for by the Official Reply of the Supreme People's Court on the Issue of Which Standard to Be Based on to Calculate Penalty of Overdue Payment (Interpretation No. 8 [1998]) of the Supreme People's Court on February 16, 1999. Serial No. 12 Names of Judicial Interpretations: Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Distrainment of Vessels by Maritime Courts before the Institution of an Action Date of Promulgation & Document No. : July 6, 1994; No. 14 [1994] of the Supreme People's Court Reasons of Abrogation: It has been substituted for by the Law of the People's Republic of China on Special Maritime Litigation Procedures adopted by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on December 25, 1999. Serial No. 13 Names of Judicial Interpretations: Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Distrainment of Vessels by Maritime Courts before the Institution of an Action Date of Promulgation & Document No. : July 6, 1994; Official Reply No. 7 [1996] of the Supreme People's Court Reasons of Abrogation: It has been substituted for by the Official Reply of the Supreme People's Court on the Issue of Which Standard to Be Based on to Calculate Penalty of Overdue Payment (Interpretation No. 8 [1998]) of the Supreme People's Court on February 16, 1999. Serial No.14 Names of Judicial Interpretations: Reply of the Supreme People's Court on the Issue of Whether the Public Security Organ Shall Bear the Liability If a Detained Citizen Is Beaten to Death by His Inmate(s) Date of Promulgation & Document No. : Jan. 19, 1998; No. 9 (1997) concerning other Administrative Affairs Reasons of Abrogation: It has been substituted for by the Official Reply of the Supreme People's Court on the Issue of Whether the Public Security Organ Shall Bear the Liability of Administrative Indemnity Due to Its Failure to Implement Legal Administrative Duties (Interpretation No. 23 [2001]) of the Supreme People's Court on June 26, 2001. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright 2002 NovexCn.com
|